The March on Freedom
“What may be the current tariff of an honest man and patriot today? They are ambiguous and saddened, and in addition they sometimes make appeals, however they do nothing decisive and effective. They are expecting, well-intentioned, that a person else will correct the evil to ensure that there is will no longer any sorrow for the kids. At best, they sacrifice just a cheap vote, plus a tiny support and a cure for good success, most effective as they find it. “
Henry David Thoreau
Henry David Thoreau within his essay “On the Duty of Civil Disobedience” supported being disobedient for an unfair state. His ideas were relying on Mahatma Gandhi through the minister Martin Luther King Jr., who championed disobedience and resistance inside a non-violent way. Strikes, symbolic protests, the boycott of items, refusal to cover (see taxes, tolls, etc.) are peaceful strategies to resistance and civil disobedience. Usually, the peaceful struggle is away from existing political system as well as mass mobilization.
According to look into, major peace campaigns were more fortunate compared to violent resistance campaigns.
Massive mobilization had also been achieved through the minister Martin Luther King Jr. on August 28, 1963, together with the March on Washington, where 250,000 protesters participated. Gandhi succeeded in mass mobilizing his people as they created the vision of independence with the Indians through the British colonialists. This vision, containing also been transposed through Gandhi’s continuous teachings, has succeeded in achieving social solidarity using the Indian people and lowering the gap among social classes in India.
In this March, he gave his famous “I Have a Dream” speech. Martin Luther King was arrested and wrote from prison the famous “Letter from Birmingham” through which he necessary civil disobedience against unjust laws. The Kennedy government understood the explosive situation which had been created, as well as in 1964 the Human Rights Law passed.
It is very important to note that, in accordance with analysts, the situation was not created through the ones that were in opposition to the rights of black people but through the moderate supporters calling for restraint, thus triggering the rise on the violent resistance on the blacks i.e. Black Panthers.
This point can be quite much in accordance with what Thoreau wrote: “Those who, while condemning the and measures of any government, provide their submission and support are undoubtedly its most conscientious supporters, therefore they are often probably the most serious obstacles on the reform “.
Resistance campaigns are successful when they are large-scale, gain support from security forces and civil servants and, if you can, have support from abroad but from prestigious groups that wont harm the credibility in the campaign.
Support by media is also important, since it was the case together with the Martin Luther King Jr. ‘s March on Washington, that has been widely covered through the media. In the event that the media don’t help together with the provision of independent news and right technology then a “weight” is classified as independent voices i.e. on the Internet, blogs, portals, alternative YouTube channels, social websites, etc. Peace activists also emphasize the significance of distributing educational material (books, DVDs, brochures, etc.) that can inform the target audience about the connection between previous peaceful campaigns. Activists emphasize that it is particularly necessary for the mobilization, namely teaching and data (Gandhi’s example with continuous teachings confirms this fact).
We are now living in an era of economics where democracy is actually going away with the benefit in the global financial sector. Autocratic regimes will endeavor to stifle peaceful reactions through Internet monitoring, along with other means like oppression through prohibitive laws as well as intimidating citizens.
Will present day citizen so it can have or is s/he so alienated it doesn’t resist anymore? Why is there will no longer a leadership that features a vision which enable it to mobilize people? Is it maybe because leadership is every bit as alienated? Is it vain to expect leadership once the social movements all over the world are massive but not led by someone?